Denial by Design · The Public Record

The Demand of October 27, 2026

The interim payment demand to the Attorney General of Canada, published in full as delivered. Justice file X-P-2026-00094.

Delivery record

Delivered October 27, 2026, 11:08 p.m. EDT — to the Department of Justice Ministerial Correspondence Unit and, on the file, to the officer for file X-P-2026-00094 (A. Nur). Delivery confirmed on the sending lane's read-backs, which are held with the filer's records. A first transmission addressed to the Attorney General's published address ([email protected]) was rejected by the Department's mail gateway the same evening — "Recipient address rejected: Access denied" — and the demand was re-sent the same minute through the two doors above. The 24-hour period runs from delivery: payment and certificate fall due Wednesday, October 28, 2026, 11:08 p.m. EDT. The sum is not new: CAD $54,000,000 was demanded of the Minister of Justice on October 24, 2026 (file MIN-006002); that demand expired unanswered.

FROM: Francesco Longo, 3820 Tecumseh Road East, Unit 103, Windsor, Ontario N8W 1J2 · 226-260-6399
TO: The Attorney General of Canada
RE: Interim payment demanded within 24 hours — habeas corpus received, never decided; the Attorney General of Ontario in receipt eight times and never heard; no release or dismissal order ever produced — Justice File X-P-2026-00094
DATE: October 27, 2026

Attorney General:

1. The instrument and its receipt. On December 26, 2025, the applicant filed a Writ of Habeas Corpus with the Superior Court of Justice at Windsor, Ontario, with further instruments on December 30, 2025 and January 1 and 2, 2026, an original application on January 26, 2026, and a renewed application on January 28, 2026 titled "Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus with Evidence of Systemic Criminal Conspiracy." Receipt is proven by the court's own transmissions: staff letters of January 5, 15 and 27, 2026 answering it, and the transmittals of January 29 and February 26, 2026 returning endorsements upon it. A legal document received is filed, whether or not the receiving office assigns it a number.

2. No decision on the habeas corpus has ever issued. The only judicial act is an endorsement of January 28, 2026 (Carroccia J.) refusing the renewed application acceptance for filing. Its own form states COURT FILE NO.: NONE. That endorsement decided a counter question — whether the paper would be filed — and is not a hearing, a return, or a ruling on the writ. It states, as its custody premise, "I am advised that Mr. Longo has no outstanding criminal charges in the Superior Court of Justice in Windsor and is not in custody." No adviser is named in it, no record is cited in it, and no document in the Crown's or the court's production identifies the adviser or the proof relied on. A subsequent endorsement (Hebner J., February 26, 2026) answered demands addressed to Justice Carroccia by recital. To this day: no writ awarded, no return made, no body produced, no justification of any detention filed, no decision on the habeas corpus by any court.

3. The statute. The Habeas Corpus Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.1, s. 1(1) provides that where it appears by affidavit that there is reasonable and probable ground for the complaint, the judge shall award the writ, returnable immediately. Section 1(2) requires written notice of every application to the Attorney General at least 48 hours before it is made, the Attorney General being entitled as of right to be heard. The endorsements' reasons never engage the question s. 1(1) makes the threshold — the ground appearing by affidavit.

4. Your office and Ontario's were in receipt, and were never heard. Eight habeas instruments carried the Attorney General of Ontario, the Ministry of the Attorney General, or the Windsor Crown Attorney's office as addressee or copy, header-verified from the applicant's mail record: December 26, 2025 (×2), January 26, 2026, January 28, 2026 — the renewed application itself addressed TO the Attorney General of Ontario directly — February 17, 2026 (×3), and March 3, 2026 (adding the Attorney General of Canada). No document in the record mentions the s. 1(2) notice, records the Attorney General having been heard on any application, or contains any reply from any Attorney General, ministry, or Crown address to any of the eight. The Attorney General of Ontario has never answered the habeas corpus, at any time, in any form.

5. No release has ever been proven. Across the whole record — the Crown's letters of October 1, 8 and 30, 2025, the court's letters and endorsements, and every production since — no written order of release, dismissal, or withdrawal has ever been produced. The Crown, asked for the dismissal ruling, answered October 1, 2025: "Our office does not keep copies of rulings." Every statement of status in the record is qualified — current files with our office; matters pending in one named court; outstanding charges in one named court — and none is supported by an order.

6. The applicant's position, stated for the record. The writ was filed and received. The body was not produced on the day it was requested or on any day since. No release or dismissal paper exists in any production. The respondents are in default, and a ruling made upon a default of this record does not cure it. The Attorney General of Canada now holds this file (X-P-2026-00094) and the oversight duty that attends it.

Demands

A. INTERIM PAYMENT — 24 HOURS. The applicant demands an interim payment of not less than CAD $54,000,000, payable within 24 hours of delivery of this demand, pending the completion of the Attorney General of Canada's review of this record.

B. CERTIFICATE. The applicant demands that the Attorney General of Canada, or his delegate over his or her own name, issue a certificate recording: (i) the interim payment made under Demand A, its amount and date; (ii) that the Writ of Habeas Corpus described in paragraph 1 was received by the Superior Court of Justice at Windsor on the dates stated; (iii) that no court file number was assigned to it; and (iv) that no decision on the habeas corpus has ever issued.

C. THE REVIEW. The applicant does not oppose the Attorney General's review of the record; he demands that it proceed on the record as it stands, and notes that the particulars of the advice relied on in the January 28, 2026 endorsement — adviser, date, question, answer, and proof — are demanded separately of the courts and will form part of this file.

The 24-hour period in Demand A runs from delivery of this demand, which will be proven by the sending lane's delivery record. Continued default after this demand will be recorded against each office in receipt of it, as each prior default has been.

Francesco Longo
3820 Tecumseh Road East, Unit 103, Windsor, Ontario N8W 1J2
226-260-6399

Sources

The instrument as delivered October 27, 2026 (sending-lane IDs and delivery read-backs held with the filer's records; the first transmission's gateway rejection is recorded in the same file). The October 24, 2026 demand to the Minister of Justice is file MIN-006002 in the filings audit.