Canadian law is clear: when a judge has knowledge of a criminal offence and fails to act, they are unfit for the bench. They must vacate their seat. This is not optional. This is the law.
Judges Act, s.65(1): A judge of a superior court may be removed from office by the Governor General for inability to perform their duties or for misconduct.
Canadian Judicial Council: A judge who is aware of criminal conduct and fails to refer it undermines the administration of justice and public confidence in the judiciary.
s.139 CCC — Obstruction of Justice: A judge who wilfully fails to act on knowledge of a crime is obstructing the course of justice.
s.122 CRC — Breach of Trust: A public officer who breaches their duty commits an indictable offence.
The principle is absolute: a judge who sees a crime and does nothing is not neutral. They are complicit. They must vacate the seat so a judge who WILL act can take their place.
| Court | Status | What They Knew | Legal Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ontario Court of Justice | DEFAULT | Void warrant, fabricated CPIC | Vacate seat |
| Ontario Superior Court | DEFAULT | $707K forged will, mandamus ignored | Vacate seat |
| Ontario Court of Appeal | DEFAULT | All evidence presented, no ruling | Vacate seat |
| Supreme Court of Canada | DEFAULT | 100 clicks on evidence. No ruling. | Vacate seat |
| Federal Court | DEFAULT | CRCC dismissal, mandamus | Vacate seat |
| Federal Court of Appeal | DEFAULT | VCCR violation, immigration fraud | Vacate seat |
| US District Court (MDFL) | DEFAULT | Void FBI warrant, DEA fraud | Vacate seat |
| US 11th Circuit | DEFAULT | Coram nobis denied on void predicate | Vacate seat |
| CRCC | DEFAULT | 560 clicks. Dismissed complaint. | Vacate seat |
| LECA | DEFAULT | E-202606011107233651 — no ruling | Vacate seat |
| Italy (Palermo/VCCR) | DEFAULT | Italy MFA clicked 1,882 times. No action. | VCCR violation |
| Official | Clicks | Role | Duty They Violated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anita Anand | 1,663 | Treasury Board President / Former AG / VCCR authority | Duty to prosecute (as AG). Duty to enforce VCCR (as Global Affairs authority). Did neither. |
| Bill Blair | 765 | Former Toronto Police Chief / Privy Councillor | s.139 obstruction after knowledge |
| Dominic LeBlanc | 443 | Privy Council President | Duty to refer to Justice. Did nothing. |
| Premier Ford | 831 | Premier of Ontario | Provincial duty to intervene. Did nothing. |
| RCMP Commissioner | 921 | Head of RCMP (CPIC fabricator) | s.122 breach of trust. Read evidence of own crimes. |
| PM Trudeau | 623 | Prime Minister | Highest office. Zero action. |
Anita Anand is not just "the former AG." She holds three positions that each independently require her to act on this evidence:
1. Former Attorney General of Canada — The AG has a constitutional duty to prosecute offences in the public interest. She was sent the evidence. She clicked 1,663 times. She did not prosecute.
2. President of the Treasury Board — She controls government spending. She knows victim services money went to agencies that blocked evidence instead of helping victims. She did not audit. She did not investigate.
3. Authority on the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) — As the minister responsible for Global Affairs, she has the duty to rule on VCCR violations. Italy's MFA clicked 1,882 times. Italy violated the Palermo Convention and Rule 94. Anand has not ruled.
Three independent duties. Three independent failures. Each one is grounds for removal. Together, they are a pattern of conscious, deliberate inaction in the face of irrefutable evidence.
The law does not require permission to enforce it.
Under s.504 CCC, any person who has reasonable grounds to believe an indictable offence has been committed may lay an information.
Under s.122 CRC, a public officer who breaches their duty commits an offence.
Under s.139 CCC, wilfully failing to act on knowledge of a crime is obstruction of justice.
Under the Judges Act, a judge who is unfit to perform their duties may be removed.
Every defaulting court. Every clicking official. Every blocking agency. The law is already written. The evidence is already served. The only thing missing is someone willing to enforce it.
Case 94545/21-845 · CRCC R2026-003703 · LECA E-202606011107233651 · denialbydesign.org