The Refusal of Canadian Courts to Rule on Proven Criminal Conduct
Francesco Giovanni Longo — June 21, 2026
Every judge and every court in Canada that received properly filed habeas corpus applications, mandamus demands, judicial reviews, and emergency motions had a positive legal duty to adjudicate the matters before them.
When those judges and courts chose silence instead of ruling — despite being presented with clear, documented evidence of pre-crime warrants, fabricated RCMP/FBI records, autopsy forgery, insurance fraud, and 21 years of systemic persecution — their silence became active complicity in the original crimes.
A true judge who sees criminal activity this blatant does not hesitate. They rule. When they do not, they are no longer acting as judges. They are protecting the perpetrators.
| Court | Filing | Days in Default |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court of Canada | Emergency Application | 70+ days |
| Federal Court | Habeas + Mandamus | 98+ days |
| Superior Court – Windsor | Habeas Corpus #1 & #2 | 127+ / 110+ days |
| BC Supreme Court | Two $280M Judicial Reviews | 28+ days each |
Canadian judges are not permitted to ignore filings containing evidence of fabrication of police records, pre-crime warrants, autopsy forgery, and $1.2M+ insurance fraud. The moment a judge reviews such evidence and chooses not to rule, that judge becomes a participant in the cover-up.
If Canadian judges will not rule on a proven murder cover-up and record fabrication involving 21 years of evidence, then no crime in Canada can ever be prosecuted. Murder, theft, rape, and corruption can run rampant — because the final backstop has refused to enforce the law when it mattered most.
Live Evidence: denialbydesign.org